SysArc is committed to helping Department of Defense contractors comply with the government’s DFARS mandate in accordance with NIST 800-171 and 800-171A. Our IT Risk Management and Compliance services give contractors the expert resources they need to stay in compliance without overwhelming their in-house teams.

In accordance with this commitment, we’re attending the NIST Cyber Security Workshop to continue offering cutting-edge cyber security compliance services to Department of Defense Contractors throughout the United States.

The Controlled Unclassified Information Security Requirements Workshop is an informational session with Federal Government representatives. The topics discussed include the expectations of evaluating evidence, advice on how to implement the necessary CUI security requirements, best practices for this process, and the lessons that experts have learned along the way.

By going to these sessions, SysArc has the opportunity to get detailed information and updates on DFARS compliance directly from the people and agencies responsible for it. This first-hand knowledge is key to helping our clients prepare for changes to the regulations and to have the best possible implementation available.

The sessions that are scheduled to take place during this workshop are:

• Overview of Controlled Unclassified Information, the CUI Registry and the CUI Rule
• Overview of the Defense Acquisition Regulations System (DFARS) Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting Clause
• Overview of NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-171, Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations
• Overview of NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-171A, Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information
• Government Panel: Expectations for Evaluating the Implementation of CUI Security Requirements in NIST SP 800-171
• Industry Implementation of CUI Security Requirements: Best Practices and Lessons Learned

The speakers at the NIST Cyber Security Workshop come from many federal agencies, including NIST, the National Archives and Records Administration, the Department of Defense, as well as companies such as Leidos, Stackarmor, and Exostar. Dr. Ron Ross, a NIST Fellow at the Information Technology Laboratory, is the keynote speaker for this workshop.

This event takes place on Thursday, October 18th, 2018 at the NIST Red Auditorium at 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. It runs from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.

A common question that small DoD contractors and subcontractors have is whether they are subject to the requirements of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. This regulation concerns the way firms manage Controlled Unclassified Information and the minimum level of security practices that they need to adhere to.

DoD Contractors

https://www.nist.gov/mep/cybersecurity-resources-manufacturers/dfars800-171-compliance that any size DoD contractors “that process, store or transmit Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) must meet the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) minimum security standards.”

DoD Subcontractors

Subcontractors that work with Controlled Unclassified Information are also responsible for following these regulations. NIST.gov states “These security controls must be implemented at both the contractor and subcontractor levels based on the information security guidance in NIST Special Publication 800-171.”

Basically, if a firm is working with DoD Controlled Unclassified Information, they fall under DFARS requirements and should plan accordingly to bring their business into compliance.

Is It Expensive to Comply with DFARS?

The answer to this question is complicated. The areas that influence the total cost of compliance depend on several factors. The DoD contractor’s IT infrastructure complexity and the current state of its cybersecurity measures plays a large role in the expenses associated with compliance. If they already have robust IT security measures in place, it’s possible that they don’t have to change much, if anything, to meet the DFARS requirements.

The next cost-influencing consideration is whether the DoD contractor wants to do the work necessary for compliance in-house, or if they end up hiring a cyber security expert to do it for them.

A good start for small manufacturers is to purchase a gap analysis from a DFARS consultant. This analysis gives them a concrete direction on what they need to do to address the issues with security in their infrastructure. They can choose to remediate themselves or to pay an IT company to do it for them.

DoD contractors should look at the resources that they have available in-house, their current contract load and the opportunity costs associated with tackling compliance themselves. They need more than someone familiar with IT security. They need specialists who are fully acquainted with the DFARS requirements and what that looks like in practice.

The Cost of Non-compliance

Some DoD contractors may balk at the expenses associated with complying with DFARS. However, the costs for not complying with the regulations may end up being more of a resource drain in the long run. You may get a False Claims Act filed against you, be considered in breach of contract, have your existing contracts terminated or end up getting suspended. Your reputation takes a hit and you may find it difficult to get DoD contracts in the future.

The Pentagon is now factoring in cyber security assessments in their contract awards processes. If you don’t follow DFARS requirements, then you may end up losing out to your competitors during the bidding process. It takes a lot of time and effort to build up contacts and trust with the DoD. No one wants to lose that as an attempt to cut cyber security costs, especially when improving security is a best practice for businesses to begin with.

DFARS compliance should result in DoD contractors winning more contracts over time. It should be seen as a competitive advantage, as the business has proven that they’re willing to put the appropriate measures in place to keep CUI protected from unauthorized access and use.

To understand cyber security assessments, think of other checkups such as medical examinations or a vehicle inspection. In each of these cases, the best assessments aren’t simply a case of concluding “pass” or “fail”. To get the most from the exercise you need an assessor who:

• uses a clear set of objectives for what’s required;
  
• identifies shortcomings;
  
• offers practical help and advice to remedy shortcomings; then
  
• lays down guidelines and best practice to make sure you continue to meet the objectives.
  

Running The Risk

According to the Ponemon Institute, you’re now more likely than not to be hit by a cyberattack. Its report ‘State of Endpoint Security Risk’ estimated 54 percent of companies were compromised by at least one successful attack in 2017. Indeed, 70 percent of surveyed companies believe the risks they face increased in 2017.

Why? The main reason is the increasing range of incentives to attackers. Gone are the days when cyberattacks were either the work of bored pranksters trying to cause disruption or criminals trying to access confidential data for financial gain or corporate espionage. Now you also need to worry about ransomware attacks where your compromised network is effectively locked down until you pay up. Some attackers aren’t interested in your data at all and simply want to hijack your resources to help them make money from ‘mining’ virtual cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.

Ponemon reports that the average attack has a cost impact of $301 per employee. This can include direct financial losses, lost productivity, the costs of repairing or rebuilding hardware and software, and the costs of reputational damage. It’s clear that identifying and fixing security shortfalls before an attack happens makes sound financial sense.

Setting The Standard

While the precise steps a cyber security consultant takes will vary, the procedure will follow a few basic principles. The starting point is to establish the benchmarks for where your business needs to be with your security, coming at it from a couple of perspectives. One is the purely functional: neutralizing likely threats so that you can continue doing business without disruption. The other perspective is external requirements, which can include:

• meeting mandatory standards laid down by potential clients (particularly government agencies);
  
• regulations that affect your specific industry (such as protecting data under HIPAA, DFARS, GDPR, etc…); and
  
• any rules laid down by your insurers as a condition of coverage.
  

The Gap Analysis

The next step is a gap analysis. This involves:

• taking a model of how things would be working if you met the required benchmarks;
  
• inspecting your cyber set-up to see how things are really operating; and
  
• detailing exactly where and how you are falling short.
  

The big benefit of an expert cyber security consultant is that they don’t just have the experience to know exactly what to examine, but they can come at the task with an external perspective. In particular, they’ll look for security shortfalls that aren’t currently presenting any practical problem. That overcomes the limitation of internal inspections where you might be tempted to overlook a sub-optimal practice on the grounds that “it’s never been an issue so far.”

You may be surprised to discover just how much of the gap analysis involves inspecting procedures rather than just the current state of your equipment or network. To see why this is the case, imagine reviewing your home’s security. A basic inspection might show you have suitable locks in full working order. A more sophisticated audit might reveal that your hide-a-key is in an easy-to-locate place.

The Remediation Plan

Following the gap analysis, a cyber security consultant will prepare a remediation plan. This is a detailed list of the steps you must take to plug the security gap. An effective consultant will present clear, actionable steps, often in an order of priority.

Some of these steps will be straightforward such as upgrading a software security tool or reconfiguring a network. Others will be more detailed and wide-ranging, such as changing the way in which your staff authenticate themselves or redesigning your file system so you can more effectively control who can access or alter specific sets of data.

The beauty of using an expert consultant is that they not only know what changes you need to make, but have the experience to help you make them with minimal disruption to your ongoing business. Some consultants can even train your staff in security best practices and deal with any resistance or lack of enthusiasm among employees faced with changes to their work practices.

A Long-Term Cyber Security Solution

The remediation plan isn’t usually the end of the process. A cyber security consultant can return later to make sure you’ve carried out the necessary steps adequately. They could then either formally certify that you meet relevant standards and regulations or give you the assurance you need that everything is in order before you undergo an official audit.

A good consultant will also offer ongoing services to monitor or maintain your security posture. This could be as basic as returning for regular inspections or as sophisticated as installing and operating monitoring tools that can quickly identify any security breaches, spot new vulnerabilities, or highlight if staff aren’t following the procedures you’ve put in place.

If your company is interested in having an expert take a look at your systems and procedures,  get a Cyber Security Assessment from SysArc.

The Washington Post has reported that The Pentagon has developed a new strategy to protect its supply chain from cyber crime and foreign interference. As well as basing how it awards its weapons contracts on the price and performance that each contractor can offer, The Pentagon will now also consider security as an important factor when deciding which contractors to work with. This move marks an important shift in how the Pentagon regards security.

The new strategy is designed to reward DoD contractors who take their security responsibilities seriously. According to Kari Bingen, the deputy undersecretary for intelligence at the Pentagon, “Security should be seen not as a ‘cost burden,’ but as a major factor in their competitiveness for U.S. government business.”

Last year, the Department of Defense implemented a set of cybersecurity regulations that all DoD contractors must follow. These regulations are known collectively as DFARS (the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement) and are designed to protect DoD data from cyber theft. To comply with DFARS, DoD contractors must provide adequate security to protect covered defense information that is stored on or transmitted through their systems. Contractors must also report cyber incidents within a specified time period and cooperate with the DoD to investigate and respond to those incidents.

The Pentagon’s new policy will encourage all contractors to take action to ensure their businesses comply with DFARS. If they want to continue to work with the DoD, contractors will need to pay ongoing attention to their security systems and procedures to ensure they meet the required standards.

In summary, the DFARS mandate was just the beginning when it comes to improving the security of DoD contractors. The Pentagon will now have the power to force contractors to comply with the regulations, by recognizing that compliant businesses can offer a competitive advantages over those that do not comply. In simple terms, those businesses that can demonstrate compliance will win, while those that can’t will lose.

A recent report from the Pentagon suggested that businesses in the DoD supply chain should receive incentives, such as tax breaks, to encourage them to improve their security practices. The report also suggested laws to grant businesses immunity from being sued if they share information about holes in their security systems that could help to protect other companies.

If your business has any connections with the defense industry, you need to take action now to become DFARS compliant. In addition to putting in place security policies and procedures that keep all data stored on your systems safe, you also need to be able to show the DoD what measures you are taking to comply with DFARS and protect sensitive defense information.

If you can demonstrate compliance, you will gain a competitive advantage over your competitors in this security-conscious era. Your business will be more likely to secure and keep contracts with the DoD, compared to businesses that overlook the importance of a robust cybersecurity strategy.

For help with becoming DFARS compliant, you can get in touch with SysArc today. We can address your cyber security concerns and help you offer your clients the very best security for their data. If you want to win and keep contracts with the DoD, contact SysArc today to get started on improving your business’s security.

The government mandate of DFARS comes with the power to legally enforce these regulations. The penalties for non-compliance can be costly to the Department of Defense (DoD) contractor. A few of the consequences include adverse actions related to the False Claims Act, poor performance reviews, termination, and debarment. You may also be subject to lawsuits related to these data breaches¹.

DoD contractors frequently seek out an Managed Cyber Security Company to help them bring their systems and procedures into compliance. You should also consider bringing in a legal team to help you navigate the legal side of DFARS compliance.

Why Use a Cybersecurity Legal Team for DFARS Compliance

The DFARS legal document is 350 pages. Your DoD contractors may not have the time or expertise to go through the entire thing and fully understand it. A specialized legal team has learned about these requirements inside and out, from the explicitly stated standards to those that may be more ambiguous.

Your primary role as a DoD contractor does not involve legal matters, so you may not have the in-house staff necessary to field this task. Outsourcing this part of the compliance process to a team of dedicated experts makes perfect sense. You can continue making great products while maintaining and growing your government contracts.

What Do Cybersecurity Attorneys Do

A cybersecurity law firm does more than go over the legal documentation of DFARS for you. Here are a few of the important tasks that they can handle for DoD contractors:

• Draft policies and procedures: Your existing cybersecurity policies and procedures may fall short of what’s required under DFARS and other government regulations. The attorneys’ documentation skills can improve the current policies and ensure that they can accommodate future changes when new security requirements are put in place.
• Prove compliance: Once you bring your systems into compliance with DFARS, you need to prove it. This process involves specialized legal materials that are best left to an experienced team. Cybersecurity attorneys can prepare this documentation and present it to the DoD.
• Defend against lawsuits: Data breaches may lead to lawsuits due to the information that was lost or other related issues. You can have your cybersecurity attorneys handle this, rather than allowing the legal matters to eat up your time and attention.
• Cooperate with DoD investigations: The legal firm will work with the DoD during investigations following a breach or a related incident. If you had to put employees inexperienced with legal matters on this task, you could end up with some significant compliance issues.
• Advise on state data breach laws: DFARS isn’t the only regulation you need to worry about as a DoD contractor. You also need to comply with state data breach laws and may face additional penalties if you fail to take them into account. The legal firm’s job revolves around keeping up with the latest updates and changes to cybersecurity law. You don’t have to pull your resources away from DoD contracts to try and determine whether you need to make adjustments.
• Negotiate with vendors: How many vendors do you work with as a DoD contractor? When you have a lot of companies that you do business with, it’s difficult to sift through the contracts and discover opportunities to get a better deal. Cybersecurity attorneys, on the other hand, are more than happy to help negotiate these arrangements so you get the best terms possible. They can also eliminate redundant contracts that are costing you money.
• Handling False claims allegations: False claims allegations are a serious issue in government contracting. A cybersecurity law firm familiar with DFARS and other government regulations can defend you against such claims. They also improve your documentation quality to decrease the chance that you run into a False claims situation.

How Cybersecurity Attorneys Help DoD Contractors Implement Changes

You can put many technical solutions in place for better cybersecurity, but people are always the weakness in the system. Phishing attacks and other forms of social engineering are still effective at giving attackers access to sensitive systems. Cybersecurity attorneys can incorporate data security and privacy policies into your standard employee handbooks and standard operating procedures to improve cybersecurity awareness at your organization.

One way that the attorneys encourage the adoption of these policies is by using role-appropriate education. People outside of the IT department don’t need a lot of details into how phishing works. They need to know about the obvious and subtle signs that could indicate an attack, what they need to do if they suspect phishing, and who they should contact in this situation. When the policies are clear and easy to understand, it’s a lot more likely that employees will follow the new procedures.

A law firm experienced in DFARS compliance is an invaluable asset for DoD contractors. Even if you’re currently compliant, you never know when the regulation or state-level laws may change the security standards. When cybersecurity attorneys are handling the legal aspects of DFARS compliance, the rest of your staff can work on current DoD contracts and winning bids for new ones.

Sources:

https://www.cov.com/-/media/files/corporate/publications/2018/01/dfars_cyber_rule_considerations_for_contractors_in_2018.pdf

Government contractors deal with many compliance concerns during their work with Federal Government customers. Regulations such as NIST 800-171, called the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and NIST 800-53, part of the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), may be part of the technology standards that a government contractor must follow during their work. To ensure full compliance with DFARS and FISMA requirements, contractors should understand what each regulation covers, the systems that they apply to, and whether overlap occurs between them.

Who Are the Regulations Meant For?

FISMA covers Federal institutions and the information systems that they use. It’s a comprehensive set of guidelines that government institutions must follow when they secure their infrastructure. In some cases, FISMA applies to government contractors if they operate federal systems, such as providing a cloud-based platform. DFARS solely refers to the internal systems of Department of Defense contractors.

How Are the Requirements Different?

FISMA is a massive 462-page document that covers the framework that government institutions use for appropriate levels of security and privacy in their systems. The primary focus of FISMA is assisting government organizations when they’re putting together IT security protocols and strategies. There are 212 controls total in this document, although organizations don’t have to implement all of them to be in compliance.

DFARS is much smaller, with only 125 pages of guidelines. It covers the proper protection of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) when a non-federal organization is using that data on their internal systems. Only 109 controls are listed in this document, and all of them are required for compliance.

Where Do DFARS and FISMA Overlap?

Some of the controls of DFARS and FISMA overlap, so government contractors that have to adhere to both regulations may have some areas already covered. These controls fall under the cybersecurity best practices that contractors should already be paying attention to in order to protect against data breaches.

• Access control: Ensure that users only have the permissions they need to do their work.
• Configuration management: Confirm that the configuration is set up to maximize security for CUI.
• Ongoing maintenance: Proactively addressing potential vulnerabilities limits the opportunities for attackers.
• Accountability: Gain access to a paper trail in the event of an audit or another type of review.
• Information integrity: Maintain the integrity of the CUI and other important information on these systems.

Why Were Both Regulations Enacted?

DFARS and FISMA were enacted to provide federal institutions and government contractors with the guidelines they needed to adopt a risk-based cybersecurity approach. With cyber attacks frequently happening across all public and private sectors, it was important to create a standard for government agencies and contractors to follow so an appropriate level of security was in place.

Without this type of regulation, government contractors and institutions would have a greater risk of data breaches and other IT security problems. The controls outlined in these documents act as a set of best practices for organizations to follow.

Keeping government systems and CUI secure and protected are essential tasks, but contractors should pay close attention to see which framework actually applies to the project. In some cases, government agencies will default to requiring contractors to comply with the much broader FISMA, even if DFARS is more suitable for the type of work that they’re doing.

If you are a DoD contractor and need assistance with DFARS or FISMA compliance, contact us about our consulting services:

• DFARS compliance consulting
• FISMA compliance consulting

In February 2018, it was revealed that Russian hackers had exploited a loophole in the security systems of U.S. defense contractors in an attempt to steal some of the country’s biggest secrets. According to an Associated Press investigation, the Russians attempted to steal advanced defense technology by exploiting weaknesses in email security.

The Fancy Bear Attack

It is not clear what the hacking group, known as Fancy Bear, managed to steal. However, the threat is enough to make U.S. defense contractors worried. The hackers, who are also accused of interfering in the election in 2016, targeted at least 87 people working on some of the most sensitive defense technologies: military drones, rockets, stealth fighter jets, missiles, and cloud-computing platforms used by the military.

Fancy Bear used a phishing technique to gain access to data, according to an investigation into the hacking incident. They sent emails primarily to people’s personal Gmail accounts, as well as to a few corporate accounts, that contained phishing links. Worryingly, 40 percent of the people targeted clicked on these links, allowing hackers to take the first step toward being able to hack their targets’ accounts and computers.

In May 2015, Fancy Bear targeted the Gmail account of a senior engineer who was working on the X-37B project at Boeing. Just two weeks earlier, the Russian Deputy Prime Minister had expressed concern that this unmanned space plane was allowing the United States to push ahead in the realm of space flight. Clearly, the Russians had decided to use cyber warfare to prevent the U.S. from gaining a technological edge.

Boeing’s X-37B technology was not the only U.S. project targeted by the hackers; Fancy Bear also went after people who were working on cloud-based services, trying to get hold of classified data from contractors that work for the FBI and other U.S. intelligence agencies.

Fighting Back Against Foreign Government Attacks

In this age of cyber warfare, the United States government is keen to protect data from attacks by foreign powers. However, the way that data is often distributed among various defense departments and third-party contractors makes this difficult.

The response of the Department of Defense to the threat is https://www.nist.gov/mep/cybersecurity-resources-manufacturers/dfars800-171-compliance (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement). This government mandate extends the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to increase the scope of the regulations that U.S. defense contractors must follow to ensure that all the sensitive data they handle is kept safe.

What is DFARS?

In simple terms, DFARS is a set of new regulations that applies to all contractors that supply goods and services to the Department of Defense (DoD). It requires contractors to protect DoD information through a range of guidelines that are outlined in a document called NIST.

Contractors must also report cyber incidents to the DoD within 72 hours. This reporting requirement ensures that the DoD is able to track the threats that are currently facing U.S. companies. However, it poses a headache for DoD contractors who do not yet have adequate systems set up to monitor activity on their networks.

Contractors who fail to comply with DFARS risk losing their DoD contracts. They may also face fines if they put U.S. DoD information at risk. In the light of escalating tensions between the United States and Russia, the Department of Defense is keen to crack down on all weaknesses that could expose sensitive data to potentially hostile foreign powers.

How DoD Contractors Are Complying With DFARS

DFARS compliance is a big challenge for many businesses, particularly small contractors who do not have large IT departments or significant resources to spend on improving security. For these companies, the best option is usually to work with a U.S. IT company to ensure compliance. By outsourcing compliance in this way, DoD contractors can remain free to focus on their core business operations. Working with an IT company is also, in many cases, much more cost-effective than hiring professionals and purchasing tools to manage their own security systems in house. For more information on DoD Contractors can can comply with DFARS, please see our DFARS guide here.

How IT Companies Help DoD Contractors Comply With DFARS

IT companies that specialize in managed cyber security, more specifically DFARS consulting, are prepared to help DoD contractors to comply with DFARS. The first step an IT company takes is to assess the contractor’s current IT systems to identify any gaps in security.

Once potential weaknesses have been identified, the IT company can take action to secure the network and reduce the risk of a successful hacking attack. As part of ensuring compliance, the IT company will also set up systems that can detect and report cyber threats, allowing the DoD contractor to meet the requirement to report all incidents within 72 hours.

Unlike many contractors, IT companies employ professionals who are leading experts in the field of cyber security. These professionals have the skills and experience necessary to protect against all kinds of cyber threats. They keep up to date with the latest techniques that Russian hackers and other groups of cyber criminals are using to try to steal data from U.S. defense contractors. This expertise allows them to take action to reduce the risk of a successful attack.

In January and February, hackers from the Chinese government breached a Navy contractor. The data that they stole covered undersea warfare. One of the most troubling pieces of information taken in the breach was supersonic anti-ship missile plans. More than 600 GB total of sensitive and secret data was compromised in this attack.

The Navy contractor failed to follow DFARS regulations for the storage and protection of the data it was working with. Similar attacks conducted by Chinese hackers also focus on contractors supporting US military branches, rather than attacking federal government agencies directly.

How DFARS Compliance Could Have Prevented This Breach

The information taken in this recent attack was stored on an unclassified network. DFARS requires that government contractors have security controls in place on this type of network, which may have thwarted the hackers’ efforts in this situation.

Many DFARS requirements fall under cybersecurity best practices that the contractor should follow automatically.

It covers these areas:

• Access control for the authorized users of the system
• Training employees and making them aware of cybersecurity measures
• Auditing the security of the system and key areas
• Putting together incident management plans
• Getting accountability in place, how to configure the network to keep data safe
• Identifying and authenticating users
• Maintaining the systems
• Protecting media
• Establishing personnel security
• Implementing physical protection

The Liability of Non-compliance

Failing to comply with DFARS leads to one or more consequences for the government contractor. At the basic level, the business is failing to adhere to the contract between it and the government agency. The security requirements are laid out in DFARS, so there is no lack of clarity in what they need to do.

Other consequences of not complying with DFARS includes:

• Liquidated damages: If a contractor loses sensitive information, that can lead to substantial problems for the government agency. It may choose to penalize a company up to $5,000 per affected person, which can add up quickly in a data breach.
• Terminating the contract: The government agency may choose to dissolve the agreement with the contractors. This situation could lead to financial ruin for the company, as it loses a steady contract and it has its reputation sullied for other clients.

DFARS Compliance Resources

Becoming compliant with DFARS requirements may involve more than the in-house IT staff. The regulations cover everything from how users access the system to the procedures around physical access to the servers. The cybersecurity requirements can get even more complicated if a contractor uses a hybrid infrastructure with public and private clouds alongside on-premises systems.

A DFARS compliance consultant has an extensive amount of experience with these regulations. They have worked with multiple contractors to ensure that every business is compliant with the cybersecurity requirements.

This skilled assistance is particularly helpful when a government contractor is first going through the compliance process or following a non-compliance problem. Their entire job revolves around making sure that contractors are following the rules, as well as staying on top of any changes to them. They are an invaluable asset to keep on hand.

DFARS compliance could have lead to a much different outcome in the cyber attack mentioned at the beginning of this article. Cybersecurity best practices make it more difficult for hackers to find vulnerable attack surfaces or gain access through social engineering. Government contractors should check their compliance and bring in additional help as needed to remain up-to-date on the latest regulations.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published an update to DFARS SP 800-171 documentation on June 7th, 2018 called SP 800-171 Rev.1.

According to NIST, “The errata update includes minor editorial changes to selected CUI security requirements, some additional references and definitions, and a new appendix that contains an expanded discussion about each CUI requirement.” These changes are outlined on “Errata” on pages 9 through 15″

Download Revision 1 of SP 800-171